Sunday, June 25, 2006

Food!

Was a great article on PBS Friday night on Charlie Rose show.
The guest is a former magazine editor who decided to study cooking for an article.

He befriended and wrote about an Executive Chef in New York who gave him an opportunity to cook at one of his restaurants.

It brought to mind the young chef who is a client of mine.
Energetic! Bouncing off the walls! Happy! (well laid and paid) and running a mile a minute!

The author shared that cooking in a professional kitchen is experiencial.
Amatuers and home chefs read and use recipies.
Pros use the 5 senses.

The author worked at the pasta station to start but was later promoted to the grill.
His 'teacher' shared that it was better at the grill, as working pasta, he merely reheated what someone else had already created.
By working at the grill, he would "Make food".

He also talked of "kitchen awareness".
That food changes sounds and smells as it progresses.
Great cooks know by the sound when something is ready.

He realized that he had become a "learner" and cooking offered unlimited challenges.

(I better understand my client now.)

The magazine article has now become a book.
The athor wanted to learn more about making pasta, so he traveled to Italy to learn from the masters.
Women who have been making pasta the same way their mothers and mother's mothers back 500 years.

Italians know that great food, hand made food, takes the best ingredients.
Great ingredients come from people you know.
People who grow the produce and the animals.
You know the people by name.

I learned that great pasta is all about the eggs.

I learned that our American food is tasteless because we have choosen the road of mass production. Mass distribution.

This way of thinking also robs us of connectedness and self promotion.

Fast food may "create jobs" but the money they collect doesn't stay local but ships out to HQ.

Omaha, Zelda tells me, has a great farmer's market.
And limited fast food.

Must explain why they have such great food...














Author Bill Buford “Heat: An Amateur's Adventures as a Kitchen Slave”

Ouch

I woke this morning,
the sound of breaking glass
my alarm clock.

I made my way down the hall to the kitchen
where Zelda's favorite glass pitcher,
that lives on the top of the refrigerator
lay in uncountable slivers
along with Snoopy's water dish
on the floor.

"Suicide?"
I have owned Begonia plants
that deciding the world through the window is not enough
have chosen to jump from the window sill.

Maybe a "Murder/Suicide?"
It's possible the water dish said something obnoxious,
or the pitcher was jealous
not being used as often
as the water dish...

Nah, probably Milo.

But how did he make it to the top of the fridge?

Zelda had that answer.
Gaea has done this before via the stove.

I carefully cleaned everything up and went back to bed.

Fast forward to later in the afternoon.

Zelda notices what looks like blood on the bathroom vanity.

I check Milo.

No blood.

I check Snoopy.

White fur, I spot some blood on his tummy,
but no cut.

Where's Gaea?

Zelda finally spotted the cut on Snoopy's leg.

Must be the glass.

I cleaned again.

By the end of the day

Zelda had stepped on a shard.

I also found one.

And Snoopy went to the kitty ER.

Some how he ended up with a mostly superficial cut longer than an inch.

So Zelda's beautiful glass pitcher ended costing over $500.00 in vet fees.

MILO!!!

(the youngest always gets the blame)


And my apologies for the length of the last blog.
(Yes, I did read the whole thing before I posted it...)

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

The Future is here

In Europe,
the old and the new mix
to create great places to work and live.

By observing what is there,
what has come before,
the designer "listens" to the years of human touch
and adds something of themselves.

It makes for great spaces.

Just think of the very popular lofts here in the US.
***
Mix in the need for "green" design and you get the newest trend in "old and new".

The following is an article from this year's AIA convention closer, William McDonough.

If you have heard about the Ford auto plant that uses the worlds largest green roof, acres of plant material to hold down water consumption as well as insulates, you have heard of his work.

I have included a link to his web site.

***

“Being Less Bad Is Not Being Good”Green architect William McDonough calls for new tools and leadership in sustainable design.

“One hallmark of an architectural education is the ability to shift scales: We can view the world differently, depending on where we stand,” said Architectural Record Editor in Chief and Editorial Director of McGraw-Hill Construction Robert Ivy, FAIA, as he introduced the closing session speaker of the AIA national convention on June 10. “One architect among us has enlarged the range of perspective from the minutely small, at the level of the molecule, to the whole planet, challenging us to reconsider our notions of time as well.”
Introducing William McDonough, FAIA, Ivy said, “In leading the profession, he employs the classic skills, including rhetoric, the art of persuasion, to literally change the world. He has articulated a position, what we today call sustainability.” Ivy noted that with $3 a gallon gasoline and world-wrenching environmental disturbances, all of us—professionals and clients alike—are concerned and motivated to change. “Sustainability has evolved from the protective purview of a special granola few to the intelligent way to design. The effective spokesperson for this development is not a politician, but an architect.”
Design for the living?“I would like to make a point of honoring the people with whom I work—including Kevin Burke, AIA; Mark Rylander, AIA; and Diane Dale.” McDonough said. He also paid homage to Thomas Jefferson, our only architect president. When McDonough served as dean of the architecture school at the University of Virginia, he said, he had the privilege of living in a residence designed by Jefferson. It was an extraordinary experience, he said, “because you realize that Jefferson considered himself foremost a designer.”
That also is evident in Jefferson’s last design: of his own tombstone, McDonough said. He included on it only three of his myriad accomplishments, and they all were things he designed: the Declaration of Independence, Virginia’s Statute of Religious Freedom, and the University of Virginia. It’s interesting, McDonough noted, that he didn’t include two terms as president of the United States! Jefferson’s eloquence recorded for all posterity the fundamental human rights of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Moreover, McDonough said, Jefferson believed that earthly resources belong to the living, and it is our responsibility to leave to the next generation, when our lives are through, at least as much as we started with.

First signal of human intention“As architects, we need to ask whom are we designing for—the dead or the living?” McDonough declared. “Design is the first signal of human intention. So, what is our intention as a species? We’ve reached the point of evolution where we can decide what happens next to the planet.”
McDonough and his team believe that to be responsible, “we must love all the children of all species of all time.” How do they strive to do this? The firm begins all projects by reaffirming their goal: “A delightfully diverse, healthy, and just world, with clean air, water, soil, and power—economically, equitably, ecologically, and elegantly enjoyed.”
At a recent meeting at the White House, the noted architect was asked his opinion of nuclear power. He replied that he was all for it, especially fusion. He just thanks God that the reactor is 93 million miles away, offers free energy that can reach us in about eight minutes, and is totally wireless. The point is, he says, we need an end game. “The climate tragedies of our time are of our making.”
Toward a green architectureMcDonough offered a brief history of the events that have shaped his thinking and practice. Born in Tokyo and raised in Hong Kong, he grew up experiencing a way of life with an intimate relationship to the land and a very tight equation between nutrition and waste. Childhood summers in Seattle and later attendance at an affluent high school in Connecticut showed him a different life of waste and affluence. He studied Modern architecture at Yale in Brutalist architecture. When he graduated in 1969 and saw the Apollo-mission photographs of earth, “away went away,” he said. It was no longer acceptable to him to throw things away. “Where is ‘away’ anyway?” he asked.
He opened his own firm, and the Environmental Defense Fund Offices in New York City was his first project. In 1989, he designed a skyscraper in Poland, incorporating as an integral part of the project the planting of enough trees to counterbalance the energy use of the building. Soon after, he designed a daycare center in Frankfort that was a “building like a tree,” that could take in and nourish with rainwater and sunlight. In 1991, he wrote the “Hanover Principles: Design for Sustainability,” which guided the design of the 2000 World’s Fair in Hanover, Germany.

Growth is goodWhile designing the daycare center, he said, McDonough began to wonder what was in the building and furnishing materials, noting that the kids would put their mouths on everything. It was the impetus for development of his “cradle-to-cradle” strategies, which analyze down to the molecular level the materials in the products we use—not just cradle to grave (manufacture to disposal)—but from creation to re-creation through complete cyclical reuse. In 2002, he wrote Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, with chemist Michael Braungart, which essentially calls for a revolution—not evolution—in the way goods are manufactured to eliminate waste and thus perpetually create resources. “Being less bad is not being good,” McDonough exhorted. “The environmental movement has not caught on, because it’s still about being less bad. We’re going to have to develop new tools to discover what 100 percent sustainable means for business. This is called leadership—in leadership, growth is good.”
McDonough explained that Nobel Prize-winning chemist Francis Crick, the discoverer of DNA, said that living organisms need three things to be alive: growth, a free form of energy, and an open operating system of chemistry (i.e., a metabolism) to support the organism. “But what do we want to grow?” McDonough asked. “We want biology to be celebrated for its diversity, but not technical diversity,” he said. “We need to design healthy, safe things from the molecular level up.”
McDonough and his firm designed a fabric for Steelcase in 1993, which was chosen by Airbus for use in its planes. “It’s the safest fabric on the planet,” McDonough said. “You can eat it. The water coming out of its manufacturing mill is as clean as the water going into it. The manufacturer, Shaw Industries, will recycle the carpet when you’re done with it.”
The firm can now analyze the composition of some 6,000 chemicals. They are taking on the design of greeting cards (which Shaw recycles into carpet), as well as working with Nike toward recyclable sneakers (you bring the old pair in when you buy your new pair), and with Ford to create the Model U, a car based on cradle-to-cradle principles.

Sustainability in actionMcDonough presented a number of his firm’s projects—many of which are award-winning buildings that were familiar to the audience—which use these principles, including:
• The Herman Miller Building, Holland, Mich. (1995): Productivity in this plant doubled, McDonough said. And resource savings paid for the building in four months.
• Gap Building in San Bruno, Calif., (1999): The firm worked with Gensler as the executive architect. Its roof emulates the area’s native savannah; the architects secured the native-plant seeds from federal land. Its raised floors allow free circulation of outside air.
• Nike European Headquarters, the Netherlands (1999). The firm won the design competition by submitting no entry. “If we designed a building without looking at your site or meeting you, that would be arrogant and stupid. Why would you hire anyone arrogant and stupid?” McDonough told Nike. They got the commission and got their subsequent design approved in two weeks and the project built it in two years. Nike expected the approval process alone to take two years.
• Adam Joseph Lewis Center for Environmental Studies at Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio, (2001): This project is designed for chemically sensitive students. McDonough reports that the building is used twice as much as they originally thought it would be.
• Ford Rouge Center Plant and Master Plan, Dearborn, Mich., Plant: This 20-year project uses native plants as its roof cover. The designers got the commission by showing their water bio-treatment could save Ford $35 million from day one over the cost of conventional systems, which got Ford Board approval in one minute, McDonough said.• The NMSI Wroughton Natural Collections Centre Project, Wroughton, U.K. This project, currently on the boards, turns a World War II airfield into an artifacts storage center, museum, and elder hostel—replete with sheep on the roof.

A lightweight catenary structure uses soil/grass roof as ballast as part of its cradle-to-cradle design.
Practicing design humility“We need to recognize that building design and natural design are the same thing.” McDonough said. He reported that his firm has many other projects on the boards that embody these principles. In all of our work, we need to recognize the concept of “design humility,” he told the audience. “We need to realize that it took us 5,000 years to put wheels on our luggage. We’re not that smart.”
Is it right to worry about changing weather patterns and global warming produced by our current design, building, and manufacturing processes? “We’re not worried enough,” McDonoughexhorted. Some 40 percent of the carbon produced by humans since 1850s is now in our oceans. This has decreased the ocean’s pH from its natural 8.8 to 8.2, and it is projected to reach 8.0 by the end of the century. At 7.9, the coral reefs will dissolve. “If design is our intention—do we intend to change?” McDonough asked. “What are the changes we intend to make? And how do we intend to change?”
China is our futureThese notions bring us full circle to China, McDonough noted. If they adopt the current manufacturing processes we use, they will toxify their country, and sell the toxic goods to us. And, since we’re giving them all of our money for goods, that’s not a sound business strategy. The first law of business is “do not destroy the client,” McDonough said.
On the other hand, if they make cradle-to-cradle goods, McDonough said, everyone wins. The country has adopted the cradle-to-cradle principles as their national industrial policy. The president of China has declared the necessity of a nationwide “virtuous cycle,” which is the Chinese translation of “cradle to cradle,” and is committed to “resolutely stopping all practices that are detrimental to nature.”
In the residential arena, McDonough explained, China will need to house 400 million people in the next 12 years, and if they use “business as usual” design, they will lose 25 percent of their farmland.

He presented his firm’s design for an extension of the city of Luizhou, where sewage will be sold as fertilizer, methane will be burned to supply 20 percent of the cooking fuel, and direct solar collectors will provide cladding and supply power. Most remarkable, soil from the existing farmland site will be lifted and placed on all the roofs of the city’s buildings, so the farmland will be preserved. McDonough reported that the master plan was approved six months ago, and Luizhou will serve as a national demonstration project
It’s not hard for his firm to know what to do, McDonough concluded. They have an end game, because, “Our goal is a delightfully diverse, healthy and just world—with clean air, water, soil, and power—economically, equitably, ecologically, and elegantly enjoyed.”


—Stephanie StubbsCopyright 2006 The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved.

kitty detant

This evening something special happened.

Mr. Snoopy

crouched down...

took aim...

set his legs...

rocket butt style,

and

POUNCED

on Milo!


There is still some communication and getting use to each other yet to do...
but they are begining to


PLAY!!!


yea

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

One man's trash is another man's new home...

I'm watching a program on PBS that focuses on reuse of waste materials to create new things.
Tonight's example is the reuse of an old concrete and steel bridge for a modern home.

One of the architects who hosts the show spoke at the National American Institute of Architects (AIA) convention this year.

I plan to write about him, so I was happily suprised to see him to night.

He thinks completely different from anyone else I've ever read.

Check it out...

It's the future.
and some REALLY COOL design!

Monday, June 19, 2006

Tense Cat Stand Off in Texas

Much to my great dismay, Snoopy has defered his seniority to Milo.
He is, after all, a passive cat.
But I'd hoped he'd have stood his ground.

The door latch to the studio doesn't catch due to the tendency of the heavy clays in this part of the world. They expand and contract with the seasons, cracking the sheet rock and causing doors to twist.

What expansive clays means is, Snoopy is able to push Milo's room door open and release the "fun".

I'm home sick today and there has been growling and hissing and great displays of puffed up tails.

Milo switches between going on the attack, (attacking Snoopy only at this time as Gaea simply will not have it) to playing with the mirade kitty toys scattered about the house.

Even now he's playing with the ball-in-track scratchy thingy.

Zelda assures me things will work themselves out.
It just is painful to see my Snoopy backing down from a "7 year old".

Gaea has been giving Milo his space, and going about her business as usual.
I don't think Milo appreciates the magnitude of the situation.
He may beable to push Snoopy, but he'll get a suprise if he thinks he'll be able to mess with the Princess of da house.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Texas Ranch House II

I had the suprise of having the producer of Texas Ranch House stop by and read my blog.

I am sorry to say that it was not a more in depth commentary on my part.

Originally the show caused a great number of thoughts and questions to arise in my mind.

(Ask Zelda, I was captivated by the whole thing. Must be the Texan in me...)

Unfortunately, I didn't not get them down in print.

Mr. Barreto's visit has brought some of them back to mind.

The actions of some of the participants in the show demonstrates human nature.

The power of suggestion.

I have found my self caught up in narrow mindedness that begets more narrow mindedness till all I can see is the "obvious" out come that I decided upon in the first place.

A loss for words...how to verbalize my thoughts...

My last company was like this.

The folks in the show became more and more polarized as things happened.
Soon there was no way they could back down from their point of vue with out damaging their egos.

Or, maybe better said, their egos got in the way of what was best for everyone.

***
I would like to think that I could have done better, but I know that I, like Mr. Cook, don't have the skills.

I can think of some who would have made it work.
My current boss for one.

It's a way of thinking and being.
But he's had years to develop this way of life.

***
The other thought is the mix.

It is unfair to say the Canadian show was "better" than the US programs.

It was very different.
For one, it only included four people, no children, and was for a year.

These folks had to be committed.

The British shows involved a single family, (though Manor House did involve a larger group).

The American shows could be said to be more ambitious.

But I think it would be difficult to "get committed" to it when in the back of your mind, you know that in three months it will end, and the out come "really doesn't matter" to your future lively hood.

By example, Zelda is having trouble trying to keep working since she only has one week left.

Senioritis of sorts...

***
It made me angry with the Cook family, Mrs. Cook in particular, that they didn't succeed.
Though in the end, it was Mr. Cook who backed down on his word.

How many times do we pat our selves on the back for being cruel to others.

I cared about these people and felt sad that it turned out the way it did.

And like the Frontier House filmed in Montana (where I was born) it involved a California family that applied Modern 'How to look good thinking' to a nature model.

Nature has rules that simply can be broken.
Living in our insulated lives, we have forgotten them.

Steven Covey has a great example.

How many of us have crammed for an exam?
wait till the last moment, study all we can and hope to pass.

Now, remove "humanity" from the picture.
How successful would this be in a natural setting, ie. a farm.

It's the story of the ants and the grasshopper.

Goof off all summer, cram the planting in at the last moment and hope nature provides a bountiful harvest.

After all, Captain Kirk always saved the Universe in the last 10 minutes...

HHeeerrreee'ss MILO!


Snoopy is pouting and insecure, but I spent the evening loving on him.

Zelda is smitten with Milo.
He talks, purrs, and loves his tummy scritched.

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Game four

Go Mavs!!!

What Have We Done!?

"we need kitty litter" she said.

This was after she had sent photos of new kitties to me.

"we need a new kitty too!"

we had discussed possibly getting a playmate for Snoopy since he Loves to play.

And this would allow me a breather.

See, I worry about Snoops getting tired of my lack of interest.

(yes, I'm worried about what my Cat thinks of me...)

that and he wears me out.

Good times to PLAY!! are right before bed,
usually after I have gotten ready to call it a night,
and the other time is first thing in the morning or as I'm walking out the door for work.

Play with me!?

So tonight we stopped by the SPCA adoption center,
Zelda had already visited the same SPCA center where we got Snoopy earlier in the day.
We were primed...

Milo is a cutie little black cat.
Maybe one year old.

Everyone but mom seems to be experiencing

Anxiety!!!

Gaia is asking

"What the HELL are you doing Mom?!"

Snoopy is thinking,

"I just worked my place in the pecking order,
got Gaia to playing with string,
And you bring someone NEW!?"

I'm thinking

"What the HELL are we doing!?"

Milo has his claws...

Snoopy, Mr. Cool,
is freaking.

And poor Milo is wondering,
"is it safe?"

On the plus side,
we are going Saturday with Ms Gaia to the V-E-T
so we will take Milo too.
At which time we can ask about claws.

I didn't want to discriminate against this little kitty based on his toes.
I also do not want to be the one to remove his "fingers".

But clawless kitties have their advantages...
they don't tear up couches,
or bed linens,
or newly upolstered chairs,
or carpets,
or clothes,
or skin,
or other kitties what don't have their claws...

I guess buying finches or maybe a canary is
right out.

Sibling rivalry...

Ah, I'm glad my brothers have moved on...

On a similar note.

Snoopy is definitely "Mine",

And Gaia is "mom's", though she has warmed to me in the last 6 months.
Which makes mom jealous...

Who will Milo claim?
(Mom already thinks it's her)

What I planned on,
and I shared this with Zelda,
is I was hoping for a cat for Snoopy...

***
What must it be like for someone who has just been told,

"We're Pregnant!" ?*!?!


Gaakkk!!

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Texas Ranch House

The US "reality" history shows have been disappointing.

I got hooked on the latest, "Texas Ranch House".
A family is "given" a ranch house, including "ranch hands", all everyday people thrown into an artificial world.

I'd like to see these folks succeed in their endevors.

To "win" the rancher must collect enough wild cattle in two and a half months , sell them for enough profit to pay his debts on the ranch and have enough left over to pay his staff.

I don't know if the producers, of the US programs, try to choose participants more for the drama.

The family they chose to be the rancher's family totally missed the message and point.

It has been a good example of modern metality of independence.

Did the producers intentionally set these people up to fail?

I'd hope not.

The linch pin to a successful ranch is the Rancher's wife.
She took care of the books, mended fences with the hired hands, and ran the house.
Her job was to keep everyone happy.

Our modern family was focused on looking good and letting the hired hands know their place in the world.

The husband was hen pecked and his wife ran the show.
Unfortunately, she lacked the generous heart towards others.

Promises made by the husband to his staff were broken.
When one of the cowboys was 'kidnapped' by the locals, the ranchers were more concerned about the cattle, which they found for free, than the experienced cowboy.

Food was left to rot on the vine.
Sex roles were the focus rather than pulling together to make this all work.

In the end, the ranch fails.
****
The most successful of these shows was Canadian.
Maybe it's the Canadian point of view that made it work.
Two couples were given a full year to build a home and grow their food and if they were still working it after the year, they earned $100,000.00 Canadian.
Both couples pulled together and made it.

The others were British.
Which also seemed to work.

But not us Americans...

sigh...

CO2

I saw an interesting article on PBS the other day about capturing Carbon Dioxide emissions using sodium hydroxide mixed in water.

Air is passed through this mix and the CO2 is bonded to the sodium hydroxide.
Take a look at the link above.

The original concept was a young girl's school science project.

End result, her father, a scientist, believes that in large enough amounts, we can remove engough CO2 from the air to bring us back in balance.

What this won't balance is the heat already abosorbed by the oceans.

But it is something I have been thinking about for days.

To have blue skys again...

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Testing

I reviewed the exam section I failed.

Saturday before the exam, I made a judgement call.
To not worry too much about the tread heights.

The exams are, on the whole, pretty easy.

If I had spent 30 minutes working on 7" risers, I would have spent the next couple of days thinking about it.

I would have been prepared with some methods of attack.

My fault I failed.

I wasn't prepared.

DSL trouble

We have had some dsl trouble all this week.
Haven't had the time to call in.
(No, we haven't been busy, just spending all our time in front of the tele.)

Zelda has some news on the job front that she needs to share.
Bombard her comments with questions and fill up her email box till she does.


Spent the morning in the drive way moving things from the garage out for the Salvation Army.

Bulk brush also finally made it by to pick up all the tree limbs.

With the change in the weather patterns due the non existant global warming, Texas now seems to get LOTS of rain in short spurts.
And then it's dry for years.

We may actually begin to resemble the landscapes in the Texas Cowboy movies...

Monday, June 05, 2006

blaaaaa

I feel bla now that the day is over.

My ego is brused from having failed one section...

Anyway...

My mind locked up and I began to panic.
Never a good thing.
I went round and round with the design.

What sucks is I have been drawing and laying out stairs for offices, apartments, etc. for ten years.

I have never created a stair plan in the method or style required by the exam...

Anyway...

Eight weeks to confirm what I already know (minus any details).

Six months before I can sit for that section again.

Plus I get to take all six parts again, not just the one I failed.

Sigh...

In the final moments...

Took my exam today.

Two parts.

First section 2.5 hrs.

Second part 2.75 hours.

I finished with 30 minutes to spare on the first section.

I had exactly 16 seconds as I made my final click on the second.

I took too long on section 2 part one.
Then got flustered with section 2 part two.
Took a break, when to the last section, sped through it and back to previous unfinished section.

As I was taking the last couple of minutes, literally, I verified some numbers.
They were wrong. Corrected them.
On to the next set of numbers.
Also wrong. Corrected them.

16 seconds...


I realize in the after math that I changed the last numbers from correct to incorrect.

Automatic failure...

At least I can say I know the why...

That and I was too cocky.
They threw multiples of 7 at me.
I was expecting 6.

that one little inch...

Friday, June 02, 2006

family get together

Zelda and I are down this weekend at Zelda parents.

I have exam 7 on Monday so I've spent the day studying.

This one should be a tough one.

Bunny sister and hubby have joined us this weekend.

My family and Zelda's family together for food, music, and community.

Five of my favorite people in one place.

Oh, and Zelda wanted me to mention her ceritfied, excellent, first aid skills as I stepped on a tini bit of glass, which cut my foot, though it didn't hurt, it bled enough to cause some concern with the women folks but they don't think we'll have to amputate.

Just so long as I can get to my exam on Monday!